Guidelines International Network: verso standard internazionali per la produzione di linee guida
Guidelines & Standards
Guidelines International Network: verso standard internazionali per la produzione di linee guida
Evidence 2012;4(6): e1000022 doi: 10.4470/E1000022
Pubblicato: 24 ottobre 2012
Copyright: © 2012 Qaseem. Questo è un articolo open-access, distribuito con licenza Creative Commons Attribution, che ne consente l’utilizzo, la distribuzione e la riproduzione su qualsiasi supporto esclusivamente per fini non commerciali, a condizione di riportare sempre autore e citazione originale.
1. Qaseem A, Snow V, Gosfield A, Gregg D, Michl K, Wennberg D, et al. Pay for performance through the lens of medical professionalism. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:366-9.
2. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2011.
3. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:493-8.
4. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010; 182:E472-8.
5. World Health Organization. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003: Disponibile a: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/EIP_GPE_EQC_2003_1.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
6. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Guidelines Manual (January 2009). London; 2009. Disponibile a: www.nice.org.uk/guidelinesmanual. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
7. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network;2008. Disponibile a: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
8. National Health and Medical Research Council. Procedures and Requirements for Meeting the 2011 NHMRC Standard for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011.
9. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Procedures Manual. Expert Panel Version 4.0. Alexandria, VA: American Soc Clinical Oncology; 2011. Disponibile a: www.asco.org/ASCO/Downloads/Cancer%20Policy%20and%20Clinical%20Affairs/Clinical%20Affairs%20(derivative%20products)/Manual/Methodology%20Manual%201.25.11.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
10. American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association. Methodology Manual and Policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2010. Disponibile a: http://my.americanheart.org/professional/StatementsGuidelines/PoliciesDevelopment/Development/Methodologies-and-Policies-from-the-ACCAHA-Task-Force-on-Practice-Guidelines_UCM_320470_Article.jsp. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
11. Baumann MH, Lewis SZ, Gutterman D; American College of Chest Physicians. ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations. Chest. 2007;132:1015-24.
12. Edlund W, Gronseth G, Yuen S, Franklin G; Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. 2004. Disponibile a: www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/3749.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
13. Attributes of ATS documents that guide clinical practice. Recommendations of the ATS Clinical Practice Committee. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156: 2015-25.
14. Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:194-9.
15. The Intensive Care Society. SSQ Committee Guideline Policy. 2010. Disponibile a: www.ics.ac.uk/intensive_care_professional/standards_and_guidelines/ssq_guideline_policy. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
16. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Developing a Metholology for Drawing up Guidelines on Best Medical Practices: Recommendation Rec(2001)13. Strasbourg, Cedex, France: Council of Europe Publishing; 2001. Disponibile a: www.leitlinien.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/literatur/coe-rec-2001-13.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
17. Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO. Disponibile a: www.cbo.nl/en. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
18. German Agency for Quality in Medicine. Disponibile a: www.aezq.de. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
19. Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration [Editorial]. Br J Cancer. 2003;89 Suppl 1:S4-8.
20. Guidelines International Network. Development and Training Resources. Disponibile a: www.g-i-n.net/library/development-and-training-resources. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
21. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM. Guidelines you can follow and can trust. An ideal and an example [Editorial]. JAMA. 1994;271:872-3.
22. Mlika-Cabanne N, Harbour R, de Beer H, Laurence M, Cook R, Twaddle S; Guidelines International Network (GIN) Working Group on Evidence Tables. Sharing hard labour: developing a standard template for data summaries in guideline development. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:141-5.
23. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guidelines: a manual for developing evidence-based guidelines to facilitate performance measurement and quality improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:S1-28.
24. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:S1-43.
25. Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2011.
26. Kuehn BM. IOM sets out “gold standard” practices for creating guidelines, systematic reviews. JAMA. 2011;305:1846-8.
27. Ollenschläger G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, Rosenbrand K, Burgers J, Mäkelä M, et al; Board of Trustees 2002, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-IN). Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:455-60.
28. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet. 2000; 355:103-6.
29. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night [Editorial]. JAMA. 2009;301:868-9.
30. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peerreviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281:1900-5.
31. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
32. Ansari MT, Tsertsvadze A, Moher D. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000151.
33. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument. 2001. Disponibile a: www.agreetrust.org. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
34. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
35. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, et al; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:25.
36. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38.
37. Browman GP. Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century. Attitudinal barriers and not technology are the main challenges. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:959-68.
38. Browman GP. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline development: principles, challenges, and accountability to evidence [Editorial]. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 101:1-2.
39. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Ma¨kela¨ M, Zaat J; AGREE Collaboration. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:31-45.
40. Burgers JS, Grol RP, Zaat JO, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HG. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:15-9.
41. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-65.
42. Caldero´n C, Rotaeche R, Etxebarria A, Marzo M, Rico R, Barandiaran M. Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:138.
43. Calogne N, Harris R. United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Presented at Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Irvine, California, 19 April 2010.
44. Carter AO, Battista RN, Hodge MJ, Lewis S, Basinski A, Davis D. Report on activities and attitudes of organizations active in the clinical practice guidelines field. CMAJ. 1995;153:901-7.
45. Christiaens T, De Backer D, Burgers J, Baerheim A. Guidelines, evidence, and cultural factors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:141-5.
46. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:210-6.
47. Davis D, Goldman J, Palda V. Handbook on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Medical Assoc; 2007.
48. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. Using systematic reviews in clinical guideline development. In: Egger M, Smith GD, and Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. 2nd ed. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2008:400.
49. Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, Brouwers M, Browman G, Cluzeau F, et al. Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:123-32.
50. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979-83.
51. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2001;323:1100-2.
52. Fretheim A, Schu¨nemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:17.
53. Fretheim A, Schu¨nemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:15.
54. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329:1013.
55. Garfield FB, Garfield JM. Clinical judgment and clinical practice guidelines. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:1050-60.
56. Giacomini MK. The rocky road: qualitative research as evidence. Evid Based Med. 2001;6:4-6.
57. Graham ID, Harrison MB. Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8:68-72.
58. Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1230-2.
59. Greenhalgh T. “Is my practice evidence-based?” [Editorial]. BMJ. 1996;313: 957-8.
60. Griffiths F, Green E, Tsouroufli M. The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. BMJ. 2005; 330:511.
61. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Russell I. Developing clinically valid practice guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 1995;1:37-48.
62. Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, et al. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995;4:55-64.
63. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317-22.
64. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317:858-61.
65. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
66. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-6.
67. Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994;308: 1488-92.
68. Harris JS, Sinnott PL, Holland JP, Ording J, Turkelson C, Weiss M, et al. Methodology to update the practice recommendations in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, second edition. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:282-95.
69. Harrison MB, Légaré F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ. 2010;182: E78-84.
70. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Rubin HR, Haynes RB. More informative abstracts of articles describing clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:731-7.
71. Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ. 1998;316:1959-61.
72. Hutchings A, Raine R. A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11:172-9.
73. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2009.
74. Jaime J. Introduction: Practice Guidelines. Helpful Aids or Paradigm Shift? Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;16:957-8.
75. Kahan JP, Park RE, Leape LL, Bernstein SJ, Hilborne LH, Parker L, et al. Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med Care. 1996;34:512-23.
76. Kavanagh BP. The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000094.
77. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300:436-8.
78. Lewis S. Paradox, process and perception: the role of organizations in clinical practice guidelines development. CMAJ. 1995;153:1073-7.
79. Moreira T. Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1975-85.
80. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:iii-ix, 1-274.
81. National Health and Medical Research Council. A Guide to the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 1999.
82. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC Levels of Evidence and Grades for Recommendations for Developers of Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2009.
83. National Health and Medical Research Council. Procedures and Requirements for Meeting the 2011 NHMRC Standard for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011. Disponibile a: www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/procedures-and-requirements-meeting-2011-nhmrc-standard-clinical-practice-guidelines. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
84. Owens DK. Improving practice guidelines with patient-specific recommendations [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:638-9.
85. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research Clinical Guideline International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:20.
86. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:19.
87. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:14.
88. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A; Subcommittee on the Use of Research Evidence. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development. Report no. 11-2007. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2007.
89. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2002;8:145-53.
90. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7:165-73.
91. Popay J, Williams G. Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. J R Soc Med. 1998;91 Suppl 35:32-7.
92. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714.
93. Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ. 2005;331:631-3.
94. Rycroft-Malone J. Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:238-44.
95. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD; WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:13.
96. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:25.
97. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:21.
98. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:22.
99. Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J, Marger M, Wang M, Lee M. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res. 2000;34:1429-48.
100. Shekelle PG, Schriger DL. Evaluating the use of the appropriateness method in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline Development process. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:453-68.
101. McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ, Fink A, Ko CY. Developing quality indicators for elderly patients undergoing abdominal operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:870-83.
102. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:593-6.
103. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, Michel G, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:23.
104. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139: 493-8.
105. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
106. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009; 301:831-41.
107. Van der Wees PJ, Moore AP, Powers CM, Stewart A, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, de Bie RA. Development of clinical guidelines in physical therapy: perspective for international collaboration. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1551-63.
108. Winn RJ, McClure J. The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: a primer for users. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003;1:5-13.
109. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:946-52.
110. Woolf SH, DiGuiseppi CG, Atkins D, Kamerow DB. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511-38.
111. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:38.
112. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.
113. Gross PA, Greenfield S, Cretin S, Ferguson J, Grimshaw J, Grol R, et al. Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care. 2001;39:II85-92.
114. Rubenstein LV, Pugh J. Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 2:S58-64.
115. Grupo de trabajo sobre GPC. Elaboración de GuÍas de Práctica ClÍnica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Manual Metodológico. GuÍas de Práctica ClÍnica en el SNS and Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud no. 2006/0I. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo and Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud; 2007.
116. Wedzicha W, Fletcher M, Powell P. Making ERS guidelines relevant and accessible: involving patients and the public. Breathe. 2011;8:9-11.
117. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2009.
118. Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:194-9.
119. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225-30.
120. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376-80.
121. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Guideline Clearinghouse. Disponibile a: www.guideline.gov. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
122. Lomotan EA, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How “should” we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:509-13.
2. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2011.
3. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:493-8.
4. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al; AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010; 182:E472-8.
5. World Health Organization. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003: Disponibile a: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/EIP_GPE_EQC_2003_1.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
6. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Guidelines Manual (January 2009). London; 2009. Disponibile a: www.nice.org.uk/guidelinesmanual. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
7. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network;2008. Disponibile a: www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
8. National Health and Medical Research Council. Procedures and Requirements for Meeting the 2011 NHMRC Standard for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011.
9. American Society of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Procedures Manual. Expert Panel Version 4.0. Alexandria, VA: American Soc Clinical Oncology; 2011. Disponibile a: www.asco.org/ASCO/Downloads/Cancer%20Policy%20and%20Clinical%20Affairs/Clinical%20Affairs%20(derivative%20products)/Manual/Methodology%20Manual%201.25.11.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
10. American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association. Methodology Manual and Policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2010. Disponibile a: http://my.americanheart.org/professional/StatementsGuidelines/PoliciesDevelopment/Development/Methodologies-and-Policies-from-the-ACCAHA-Task-Force-on-Practice-Guidelines_UCM_320470_Article.jsp. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
11. Baumann MH, Lewis SZ, Gutterman D; American College of Chest Physicians. ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations. Chest. 2007;132:1015-24.
12. Edlund W, Gronseth G, Yuen S, Franklin G; Quality Standards Subcommittee and Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee. American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. 2004. Disponibile a: www.aan.com/globals/axon/assets/3749.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
13. Attributes of ATS documents that guide clinical practice. Recommendations of the ATS Clinical Practice Committee. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156: 2015-25.
14. Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:194-9.
15. The Intensive Care Society. SSQ Committee Guideline Policy. 2010. Disponibile a: www.ics.ac.uk/intensive_care_professional/standards_and_guidelines/ssq_guideline_policy. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
16. Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. Developing a Metholology for Drawing up Guidelines on Best Medical Practices: Recommendation Rec(2001)13. Strasbourg, Cedex, France: Council of Europe Publishing; 2001. Disponibile a: www.leitlinien.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/literatur/coe-rec-2001-13.pdf. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
17. Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO. Disponibile a: www.cbo.nl/en. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
18. German Agency for Quality in Medicine. Disponibile a: www.aezq.de. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
19. Grol R, Cluzeau FA, Burgers JS. Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration [Editorial]. Br J Cancer. 2003;89 Suppl 1:S4-8.
20. Guidelines International Network. Development and Training Resources. Disponibile a: www.g-i-n.net/library/development-and-training-resources. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
21. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM. Guidelines you can follow and can trust. An ideal and an example [Editorial]. JAMA. 1994;271:872-3.
22. Mlika-Cabanne N, Harbour R, de Beer H, Laurence M, Cook R, Twaddle S; Guidelines International Network (GIN) Working Group on Evidence Tables. Sharing hard labour: developing a standard template for data summaries in guideline development. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:141-5.
23. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guidelines: a manual for developing evidence-based guidelines to facilitate performance measurement and quality improvement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;135:S1-28.
24. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN. Clinical practice guideline development manual: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:S1-43.
25. Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2011.
26. Kuehn BM. IOM sets out “gold standard” practices for creating guidelines, systematic reviews. JAMA. 2011;305:1846-8.
27. Ollenschläger G, Marshall C, Qureshi S, Rosenbrand K, Burgers J, Mäkelä M, et al; Board of Trustees 2002, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-IN). Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:455-60.
28. Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal. Lancet. 2000; 355:103-6.
29. Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night [Editorial]. JAMA. 2009;301:868-9.
30. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peerreviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281:1900-5.
31. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
32. Ansari MT, Tsertsvadze A, Moher D. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000151.
33. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument. 2001. Disponibile a: www.agreetrust.org. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
34. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
35. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, et al; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:25.
36. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38.
37. Browman GP. Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century. Attitudinal barriers and not technology are the main challenges. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:959-68.
38. Browman GP. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline development: principles, challenges, and accountability to evidence [Editorial]. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 101:1-2.
39. Burgers JS, Grol R, Klazinga NS, Ma¨kela¨ M, Zaat J; AGREE Collaboration. Towards evidence-based clinical practice: an international survey of 18 clinical guideline programs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:31-45.
40. Burgers JS, Grol RP, Zaat JO, Spies TH, van der Bij AK, Mokkink HG. Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:15-9.
41. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458-65.
42. Caldero´n C, Rotaeche R, Etxebarria A, Marzo M, Rico R, Barandiaran M. Gaining insight into the Clinical Practice Guideline development processes: qualitative study in a workshop to implement the GRADE proposal in Spain. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:138.
43. Calogne N, Harris R. United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Presented at Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Irvine, California, 19 April 2010.
44. Carter AO, Battista RN, Hodge MJ, Lewis S, Basinski A, Davis D. Report on activities and attitudes of organizations active in the clinical practice guidelines field. CMAJ. 1995;153:901-7.
45. Christiaens T, De Backer D, Burgers J, Baerheim A. Guidelines, evidence, and cultural factors. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:141-5.
46. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:210-6.
47. Davis D, Goldman J, Palda V. Handbook on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Medical Assoc; 2007.
48. Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J. Using systematic reviews in clinical guideline development. In: Egger M, Smith GD, and Altman DG, eds. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. 2nd ed. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2008:400.
49. Fervers B, Burgers JS, Haugh MC, Brouwers M, Browman G, Cluzeau F, et al. Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:123-32.
50. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:979-83.
51. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ. 2001;323:1100-2.
52. Fretheim A, Schu¨nemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:17.
53. Fretheim A, Schu¨nemann HJ, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:15.
54. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed “mindlines?” Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ. 2004;329:1013.
55. Garfield FB, Garfield JM. Clinical judgment and clinical practice guidelines. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:1050-60.
56. Giacomini MK. The rocky road: qualitative research as evidence. Evid Based Med. 2001;6:4-6.
57. Graham ID, Harrison MB. Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines. Evid Based Nurs. 2005;8:68-72.
58. Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1998;316:1230-2.
59. Greenhalgh T. “Is my practice evidence-based?” [Editorial]. BMJ. 1996;313: 957-8.
60. Griffiths F, Green E, Tsouroufli M. The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study. BMJ. 2005; 330:511.
61. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Russell I. Developing clinically valid practice guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 1995;1:37-48.
62. Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, et al. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995;4:55-64.
63. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317-22.
64. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317:858-61.
65. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
66. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924-6.
67. Haines A, Jones R. Implementing findings of research. BMJ. 1994;308: 1488-92.
68. Harris JS, Sinnott PL, Holland JP, Ording J, Turkelson C, Weiss M, et al. Methodology to update the practice recommendations in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, second edition. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:282-95.
69. Harrison MB, Légaré F, Graham ID, Fervers B. Adapting clinical practice guidelines to local context and assessing barriers to their use. CMAJ. 2010;182: E78-84.
70. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Rubin HR, Haynes RB. More informative abstracts of articles describing clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:731-7.
71. Heathfield H, Pitty D, Hanka R. Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. BMJ. 1998;316:1959-61.
72. Hutchings A, Raine R. A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006;11:172-9.
73. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2009.
74. Jaime J. Introduction: Practice Guidelines. Helpful Aids or Paradigm Shift? Guideline Development Methods: Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;16:957-8.
75. Kahan JP, Park RE, Leape LL, Bernstein SJ, Hilborne LH, Parker L, et al. Variations by specialty in physician ratings of the appropriateness and necessity of indications for procedures. Med Care. 1996;34:512-23.
76. Kavanagh BP. The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000094.
77. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300:436-8.
78. Lewis S. Paradox, process and perception: the role of organizations in clinical practice guidelines development. CMAJ. 1995;153:1073-7.
79. Moreira T. Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1975-85.
80. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2:iii-ix, 1-274.
81. National Health and Medical Research Council. A Guide to the Development, Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 1999.
82. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC Levels of Evidence and Grades for Recommendations for Developers of Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2009.
83. National Health and Medical Research Council. Procedures and Requirements for Meeting the 2011 NHMRC Standard for Clinical Practice Guidelines. Melbourne, Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2011. Disponibile a: www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/procedures-and-requirements-meeting-2011-nhmrc-standard-clinical-practice-guidelines. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
84. Owens DK. Improving practice guidelines with patient-specific recommendations [Editorial]. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:638-9.
85. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research Clinical Guideline International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:20.
86. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 7. Deciding what evidence to include. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:19.
87. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 2. Priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:14.
88. Oxman AD, Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A; Subcommittee on the Use of Research Evidence. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development. Report no. 11-2007. Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2007.
89. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J. Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2002;8:145-53.
90. Pagliari C, Grimshaw J, Eccles M. The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development. J Eval Clin Pract. 2001;7:165-73.
91. Popay J, Williams G. Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare. J R Soc Med. 1998;91 Suppl 35:32-7.
92. Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:a1714.
93. Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods. BMJ. 2005;331:631-3.
94. Rycroft-Malone J. Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:238-44.
95. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD; WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:13.
96. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 13. Applicability, transferability and adaptation. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:25.
97. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:21.
98. Schu¨nemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:22.
99. Shekelle PG, Kravitz RL, Beart J, Marger M, Wang M, Lee M. Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res. 2000;34:1429-48.
100. Shekelle PG, Schriger DL. Evaluating the use of the appropriateness method in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Clinical Practice Guideline Development process. Health Serv Res. 1996;31:453-68.
101. McGory ML, Shekelle PG, Rubenstein LZ, Fink A, Ko CY. Developing quality indicators for elderly patients undergoing abdominal operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:870-83.
102. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:593-6.
103. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, Michel G, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:23.
104. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage JM, Slutsky J, Grimshaw J, Deshpande AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139: 493-8.
105. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
106. Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC Jr. Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009; 301:831-41.
107. Van der Wees PJ, Moore AP, Powers CM, Stewart A, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, de Bie RA. Development of clinical guidelines in physical therapy: perspective for international collaboration. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1551-63.
108. Winn RJ, McClure J. The NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: a primer for users. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2003;1:5-13.
109. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:946-52.
110. Woolf SH, DiGuiseppi CG, Atkins D, Kamerow DB. Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:511-38.
111. Francke AL, Smit MC, de Veer AJ, Mistiaen P. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:38.
112. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:iii-iv, 1-72.
113. Gross PA, Greenfield S, Cretin S, Ferguson J, Grimshaw J, Grol R, et al. Optimal methods for guideline implementation: conclusions from Leeds Castle meeting. Med Care. 2001;39:II85-92.
114. Rubenstein LV, Pugh J. Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21 Suppl 2:S58-64.
115. Grupo de trabajo sobre GPC. Elaboración de GuÍas de Práctica ClÍnica en el Sistema Nacional de Salud. Manual Metodológico. GuÍas de Práctica ClÍnica en el SNS and Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud no. 2006/0I. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo and Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud; 2007.
116. Wedzicha W, Fletcher M, Powell P. Making ERS guidelines relevant and accessible: involving patients and the public. Breathe. 2011;8:9-11.
117. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2009.
118. Qaseem A, Snow V, Owens DK, Shekelle P; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. The development of clinical practice guidelines and guidance statements of the American College of Physicians: summary of methods. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153:194-9.
119. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225-30.
120. Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376-80.
121. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality National Guideline Clearinghouse. Disponibile a: www.guideline.gov. Ultimo accesso: 24 ottobre 2012.
122. Lomotan EA, Michel G, Lin Z, Shiffman RN. How “should” we write guideline recommendations? Interpretation of deontic terminology in clinical practice guidelines: survey of the health services community. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:509-13.